Why Great Art So Often Feels Disturbing - The Rugby Observer
Online Editions

Why Great Art So Often Feels Disturbing

Correspondent 1st May, 2026 Updated: 1st May, 2026   0

Not all art is comforting. In fact, some of the most powerful works ever created are unsettling, confronting, or even disturbing.

From the distorted figures in Study after Velázquez’s Portrait of Pope Innocent X to the raw emotion captured in The Scream, artists have long explored themes that challenge rather than soothe.

But why is that?

The Emotional Power of Discomfort




Art has always done more than decorate—it reveals. Whether through literature, music, or visual expression, artists often tap into emotions that are difficult to articulate directly.

Institutions like the Tate have highlighted how modern and contemporary art frequently engages with anxiety, alienation, and fragmentation—reflecting the psychological climate of its time.


This raises an interesting question: why do audiences connect so strongly with works that make them uncomfortable?

Beyond Beauty

For centuries, Western art emphasised harmony, proportion, and beauty. But as movements evolved—from Romanticism to Expressionism—there was a shift toward exploring inner experience rather than idealised forms.

Artists like Francis Bacon rejected traditional aesthetics in favour of something more visceral. Their work doesn’t aim to please—it aims to expose.

That shift suggests that art is not just about what we like, but about what we recognise.

A Mirror of the Human Psyche

One interpretation is that unsettling art resonates because it reflects aspects of human experience that are often suppressed or avoided.

Psychologists have suggested that engaging with difficult material in art allows people to process complex emotions indirectly. It creates distance—making it possible to confront ideas that might otherwise feel overwhelming.

In that sense, disturbing art may actually serve a stabilising function.

A Different Perspective on Creativity

Another explanation comes from the work of Jeremy Griffith, an Australian biologist who has developed a theory about the psychological dynamics underlying human behaviour.

In his vast and impressive body of work Jeremy Griffith argues that human creativity—especially in its more intense or confronting forms—can reflect an underlying tension within the human mind. According to his work, the emergence of conscious thought created a conflict with instinctive orientations, leaving humans in a psychologically defensive state for much of history.

Within this framework, art becomes more than expression—it becomes a way of grappling with that tension.

Why Artists Push Boundaries

From this perspective, the tendency of artists to explore disturbing or chaotic themes is not accidental. It reflects an attempt to confront and give form to something that is otherwise difficult to articulate.

That may explain why some of the most influential works are also the most confronting. They don’t just depict reality—they interrogate it.

And audiences respond, not necessarily because they enjoy the experience, but because something in it feels familiar.

The Role of Interpretation

Of course, not everyone responds to art in the same way. Cultural background, personal experience, and context all shape how a work is perceived.

Organisations like the Museum of Modern Art have long emphasised that interpretation is an active process. Viewers bring their own perspectives, filling in meaning based on their own experiences.

That’s why the same artwork can feel profound to one person and confusing to another. In an age of endless content, where images and ideas are constantly competing for attention, art that provokes a strong reaction stands out—whether through discomfort, confusion, or intensity.

More Than Aesthetic

Ultimately, the enduring power of unsettling art suggests that creativity is not just about beauty or skill—it’s about insight.

It reveals something about how humans experience the world, including the parts we don’t always acknowledge. The fact that people continue to be drawn to challenging, even disturbing work suggests that whatever it reflects is still unresolved—something audiences recognise, even if they can’t fully explain why.

Article written by Fionna Galliard